Archive for February, 2008

SCO goes private

Posted in Businesson Feb 14, 2008

According to a story on Slashdot today, The SCO Group received $100 million of investment to get themselves out of bankruptcy and back in the forward business direction.

SCO has been in loosing in law suits it brought against Novell and IBM.

I couldn’t think of better news. I mean, from the people perspective, any good engineers still left at SCO might not loose their job. From another people perspective, now SCO has money to pay Novell, so they don’t have to lay off people.

All in all, I think all this means is there is a bigger turkey to roast and cut up.

Avago’s site search

Posted in Technicalon Feb 11, 2008

I work at HP in Fort Collins, Colorado, which shares its campus with Avago Technologies. I was curious to see what sort of products my neighbors were working on, so I checked out there website. One thing I noticed was their search box:
Avago Search Box

What the heck is a parametric search anyway?

It is important for web sites to clearly present an interface, without making the user think. Puting an abstract term like parametric search just confuses users.

Voicemail label in Gmail

Posted in Technicalon Feb 5, 2008

In my attempt to clean up my jacobbrunson.com inbox (hosted through Google Apps; powered by Gmail), I wanted to take all the email messages about voicemail from GrandCentral, Gizmo Project, and others, and apply a label to them so I can sort them away.

I thought an appropriate label for these types of messages would be Voicemail.

When I tried this, it returned the following error message:

System specific names are not allowed. Please try another name.

I don’t understand why Voicemail would be a system specific name, unless Google has something special coming to Gmail.

Improving RoI

Posted in Businesson Feb 1, 2008

I’ve fiddled around a bit with some online ads and I didn’t see a great return on investment (RoI) like I had expected.

Usually, when I create an ad, I put all the things positive about the product that I’m trying to sell. The thought was to do whatever it takes to get them to come to the site, because then they will buy.

This scheme may work with a cost per impression (CPI) payment rate for ads, where the advertiser pays for the number of times the ad appears, not how many times the ad is clicked on. Many advertising rates are listed as cost per click (CPC), meaning the advertiser pays for each person who clicks on the ad.

With CPC pricing, it may be advantageous to put something more real, such as cost, as part of the advertisement. This way, the consumer makes a little bit more information about purchasing the product before the click on the ad, and before the advertiser pays for that click.

While displaying price or other details as part of an ad may not increase the traffic to the site, it may increase the overall quality of the customer that does.

This may or may not work with some advertising services, such as Google Adwords. This service (and perhaps others) gives better performing ads better positions on sites. By displaying the price on the ad, this may decrease the click through ratio of the ad, and Google may not display the ad quite so previlently.

I haven’t actually tried any of this, but this is some of my current theory. I hope to try it in the upcoming months, and I’ll try to report back about how it goes.

Bank error in your favor

Posted in Insightson Feb 1, 2008

I think the game of monopoly got it wrong. When there are bank errors in your favor, if you want to be ethical and try and correct the error, you rarely are left benefitted.


Categories