Archive for the ‘Politics’ Category

 

Flickr Stock Image

Flickr Stock Image

President Obama wants to spend taxpayer money (to the tune of $8,000,000,000) on Amtrak to improve and expand the American passenger rail system.  I hope the money is spent well, because right now there are seious problems with traveling by train.

Suppose I wanted to travel from Denver to Salt Lake City.  There is a route, the California Zephyr, that travels once a day between these two cities.  I would have to leave Denver at 8am, to arrive in Salt Lake City 15 hours later at 11pm.  I would also have to pay $65 dollars to do so.

In comparison, I can drive at 25 mpg and at $2.50/gallon gas from Denver to Salt Lake City, 545 miles, for $55 and only take about 8 hours to drive that.

Even better, I can find a $49 flight on Southwest that will get me to Salt Lake in only an hour and a half.

Why would I want to spend more money and more time traveling by train, when I can travel faster and cheaper by both car and plane?

(image credit)

You would think that the federal politicians who helped create the enormity of confusion called Federal Income Tax would be able to figure it out better.  But that is not the case for former U.S. Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle.  Daschle was all set up to be confirmed as Secretary of Health and Human Services, a cabinet level position, when a volcano of reports about his late and unpaid taxes erupted.  Daschle withdrew his name from consideration for HHS Secretary and expressed regret about his tax problems.

Although I’m certainly not a Daschle fan, I felt sorry for anyone caught up getting all confused about taxes.  That was, until I remembered that this was one of the guys who was elected for quite a long time to solve problems like complicated taxes.

The U.S.  needs a more simple tax system, one where you don’t have to choose between 3 different forms with 4 digit idenfication numbers with double digit lines each referring to pages of instructions which refer to completion of other forms which is JUST TOO MUCH!

Tom Daschle was in a prime position to solve this sort of problem, but didn’t.  The fact that he got caught up with late and unpaid taxes I credit to the fact that he didn’t make the system more simple when he had the chance.

I think of it as just a little bit of irony.

Cleaner cars not best for economy

Posted in Politicson Jan 26, 2009

Recently, Obama signed a request for the Environmental Protection Agency to allow California and other states to be able to pass their own, stricter laws on car emissions. This would allow California to demand that automakers create more fuel-efficient cars for sale in California.

While I support the idea of creating a cleaner environment and reducing our dependency on foreign fuel, I think this is a bad move in this economy for two reasons.

First, this would give single states too much power over the U.S. economy. Auto makers cannot simply create a version of their product lines for California–they would have to drastically revise their products for the entire country. This gives California too much power and leverage over the entire U.S. economy, which is currently very delicate.

Secondly, requiring automakers to research and develop more fuel-efficient cars would place additional burdens on a fragile auto industry. Just last fall, the U.S. auto industry asked the U.S. government for a $25 Billion bailout. Placing further restrictions upon the American automakers will only cause them more trouble, to the point where they will need even more bailout money.

I want a cleaner environment, but I don’t think it is worth the cost of bankrupting the auto-industry, possibly causing the loss of hundreds of thousands of jobs. Creating tougher environmental regulations may be a good thing, but only on the federal level, and only when the economic conditions can support additional auto industry restrictions.

Obama’s request for these regulatory changes is careless and irresponsible. The number one problem in America today is the economy. But instead of working to correct the economy, Obama is trying to please too many special interests, which is instead causing further harm to the economy. It seems like Obama is trying harder to polish his democratic public image than he is to fix a failing economy.

Politics and gold fish

Posted in Funny, Politicson Nov 11, 2008

With the Obamas visiting the White House yesterday, I had a quite bazaar bizarre dream last night.

I dreamed that First Lady Laura Bush broke into the Obama’s house and stole their gold fish.  It wasn’t political hostility or anything, just that Mrs. Bush has a collection of goldfish that she has stollen from other politicians.

Obama’s first day as President-Elect has already brought international tests.  Today, Russia announced that it was going to deploy missiles near Poland in response to a US missle defense shield installation there.  It is no cooincidence or mistake that this announcement was made the day after the election.  Additionally, Russia scrapped plans to disassemble some of its cold-war-era nukes.

Read the rest of this entry »

Consider this stereotypical political advertising message:

My opponent said, “<5 word out-of-context phrase>.”  He is out of touch with mainstream America.

I will lower taxes to middle-class citizens, increase benefits by lowering costs, and increase jobs by improving the economy.  Vote for me.

My beef with politics right now is that candidates are picking apart the details of their opponents plan without even providing the details of their own plan.

I think we need to look at the details of the plans and strategies of the candidates we plan to vote for.  Plans such as “increase jobs by improving the economy” are extremely vague and are likely to be empty campaign promises.

Demand to know, “How are you going to improve this or that?” and “How to you plan to pay for these improvements?” Demand to know the details.  Always ask one more how question.

Gwen Ifill from PBS

Gwen Ifill from PBS

Suppose the moderator of tonight’s vice presidential debates is writing a pro-Obama book. Do you suppose that might produce a moderator bias in the debate?

But that is exactly the case with Gwen Ifill, who is writing a book title, The Breakthrough: Politics and Race in the Age of Obama which is to be released in January. Presumably, the book will sell better in January if Obama is elected president, providing greater financial reward for Ifill if Biden and Obama’s ticket performs better in the debates tonight.

Is it a good idea to have a moderator who could benefit financially from the outcome of a debate? Of course not.

(Image Source: Used under a creative commons license)


Categories