A change to the Olympics

Posted in Insights, Sportson Aug 5, 2016

For the last decade or so, we’ve heard about the sky rocketing costs of hosting the Olympic games.  This conversation will continue in Rio as the country spends $20 billion dollars to host the Olympics, while 20% of the population lives in the slums.  Meanwhile, fewer and fewer cities even want to play host: Only two cities even bid to host the 2022 Games: Almaty, Kazakhstan and Beijing, China.  Clearly, something should be done to reduce the burden or increase the benefit of being Olympic Host.

Here is my idea: split it up.  Instead of one city playing host, let three or four cities (or nations) play host.  For example, let Greece host the aquatic events, Rome host gymnastics, Munich host track and field, with the remaining sports divided up and played in those regions.  Existing facilities can be used where possible, and the combined travel accommodations would allow more spectators to travel and watch.

The Olympics are great because the symbolize a peaceful unity of peoples from around the world.  Allowing several nations to host a single Olympic games would only improve the message of international cooperation.

The biggest challenges would be the presentation of the Opening and Closing ceremonies.  Having all the athletes from all the countries come together in one location presents a powerful image.  Do you think they could just do a big Skype video conference?

Comment Form

Categories